The Q6 e-tron has a standard Secondary Collision Brake Assist, which automatically applies the brakes in the event of a crash to help prevent secondary collisions and prevent further injuries. The GV60 doesn’t offer a post collision braking system: in the event of a collision that triggers the airbags, more collisions are possible without the protection of airbags that may have already deployed.
Earlier warning of stopped traffic, traffic signals, dangerous road conditions, weather, or accidents, can keep driver's safer and prevent crashes. The Q6 e-tron has Car-to-X Services, a system that seamlessly communicates important warnings to the driver about impending danger, if they're available. The GV60 doesn’t offer a system that can receive automated systems from infrastructure or other vehicles.
The Audi Q6 e-tron offers an optional Top View Cameras and it also offers an optional rear camera washer to make backing always safe, regardless of road dirt or grime, while the Genesis GV60 doesn’t offer a camera washer, requiring manual cleaning.
Both the Q6 e-tron and the GV60 have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front and rear side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, driver alert monitors and available around view monitors.
Side impacts caused 23% of all road fatalities in 2018, down from 29% in 2003, when the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced its side barrier test. In order to continue improving vehicle safety, the IIHS has started using a more severe side impact test: 37 MPH (up from 31 MPH), with a 4180-pound barrier (up from 3300 pounds). The results of this newly developed test demonstrates that the Audi Q6 e-tron is safer than the GV60:
|
Q6 e-tron |
GV60 |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Structure |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Injury Criterion |
32 |
94 |
Neck Tension |
134 lbs. |
223 lbs. |
Torso |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Shoulder Deflection |
.71 in |
.87 in |
Shoulder Force |
178 lbs. |
223 lbs. |
Torso Max Deflection |
.71 in |
1.22 in |
Torso Deflection Rate |
4 MPH |
11 MPH |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Pelvis Force |
312 lbs. |
959 lbs. |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Passenger Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Neck Tension |
67 lbs. |
134 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
-67 lbs. |
-22 lbs. |
Torso |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Shoulder Deflection |
.35 in |
.79 in |
Shoulder Force |
134 lbs. |
312 lbs. |
Torso Max Deflection |
.47 in |
.87 in |
Torso Deflection Rate |
3 MPH |
5 MPH |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Pelvis Force |
402 lbs. |
602 lbs. |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |